Thursday, August 16, 2007

August 13, 2007 Venezuela, Urban Development - Aiming for a New Pittsburgh, and Falling Short

Article published by The New York Times.

Michael Stravato for The New York Times - A Warao Indian squatter camp, not part of the Harvard and M.I.T. planners’ original design.

Ciudad Guayana Journal
Aiming for a New Pittsburgh, and Falling Short
By SIMON ROMERO
Published: August 13, 2007

CIUDAD GUAYANA, Venezuela — When a group of urban planners from Harvard and M.I.T. arrived here in the early 1960s to design an industrial city almost entirely from scratch, they envisioned a “Pittsburgh of the tropics” that could anchor industrialization and population growth in southeastern Venezuela.

That vision of a city for 250,000 people materialized into a place known for its relative prosperity. But as the population grew — it is now estimated at one million — and some of the competition for land and jobs grew violent, Ciudad Guayana has become emblematic of a new kind of urban disarray. Its problems are attracting scrutiny as President Hugo Chávez embarks on a phase of utopian city building.

Bands of Warao Indians who migrated from the Orinoco River delta beg for food at intersections here. For commuters too poor to afford cars in a sprawling city with scant public transportation, bulging pickup trucks called perreras, a term loosely translated as dogmobiles, are the only option.

And not far from subdivisions for elite civil servants, with ranch-style houses and spacious driveways for sport utility vehicles, wooden shacks put up by migrants from throughout Venezuela reflect a severe housing shortage that has led to frequent clashes between the police and squatters.

“Today, we share the same problems as the rest of Venezuela,” said Leopoldo Villalobos, a prominent historian who lives here and who has tracked the city’s evolution.

Mr. Villalobos said Mr. Chávez’s efforts were part of a Venezuelan tradition of presidents trying to leave their mark by erecting new cities. Rómulo Betancourt was the force behind Ciudad Guayana, and Rafael Caldera built Ciudad Sucre on the southwestern border a decade ago to help prevent guerrilla incursions.

Mr. Chávez’s ambitious plans include a steel city near here in Bolívar State and other cities focused on oil refining, aluminum production and diamond extraction.

One Sunday in July, he began his weekly television program from a helicopter above a site near Caracas where the first of his so-called socialist cities, called Camino de los Indios, or Indian Path, is under construction. The project set off protests in Federico Quiroz, a Caracas slum from which residents will be forcibly relocated to this new city.

Ciudad Guayana remains a bastion of support for the president, its aging factories holding strategic importance for the country’s seemingly eternal quest to lessen reliance on oil exports.

Workers have been largely supportive of the changes at companies like Alcasa, an aluminum producer run by Carlos Lanz, a former Communist guerrilla and now a leading theorist on Venezuela’s efforts to allow workers to co-manage state factories.

But these experiments with socialism have not created enough economic opportunities for residents here. The housing shortage and a spate of killings in gun battles between unionized workers competing for construction jobs have raised questions about how far the commitment to a better life for Venezuela’s people extends.

“This is the most dangerous place in Venezuela for union members,” said Laurent Labrique, a director of Provea, a human rights group that is investigating more than 100 killings of unionized workers here in the last three years.

Unemployment here is estimated at nearly 14 percent, compared with the national rate of 8 percent.

Ciudad Guayana was founded in an atmosphere of optimism. Wide paved avenues and rectangular apartment blocks evoke the modernist feel of other planned cities like Brasília, built a few years earlier. Politicians in Caracas, lured by the nearby supplies of iron ore and bauxite, poured billions of dollars into building this city around steel plants and aluminum smelters.

The problems began in the early 1980s, when the federal government absorbed heavy losses at poorly managed state enterprises. By the time Mr. Chávez was elected in 1998, there was also a housing shortage that could not be solved by the high-rises built decades ago by the Corporación Venezolana de Guayana, the state holding company that controls most industry here.

A surge in land seizures ensued, with squatters empowered by Mr. Chávez’s populist statements, said Clara Irazábal, an urban planner at the University of Southern California who is from Venezuela, as shantytowns spread from San Félix, the old colonial quarter, to Puerto Ordaz, where the middle and upper classes live.

“We have no running water or asphalt for the roads, and the only electricity comes from up there,” said Niurka Muñoz, 31, a homemaker, as she pointed to a maze of wiring that illicitly siphons power off the grid into her home in Hugo Chávez Frías, a shantytown assembled from discarded wood and cinderblock that the residents named in honor of the president.

No one at state agencies has precise estimates of how many squatters there are here, though housing rights advocates say more than 10,000 new homes are needed.

The white-collar employees at Venezolana de Guayana, which manages many aspects of life in the city, say they do what they can to improve the situation. “We are trying to impose order on a difficult situation,” said Andrés Cabezas, the corporation’s vice president for territorial development, who oversees the building of new neighborhoods for squatters.

Yet even with its challenges, this city remains a magnet for those fleeing desperation elsewhere. “I dream of returning home someday,” said José Contreras, 35, one of the Waraos who live near the bus station in a camp of tents and hammocks strewn with garbage. “But this is where I’m able to find something to eat and drink.”

Friday, August 03, 2007

August 3, 2007 THE US'S RAMSHACKLE INFRASTRUCTURE

August 03, 2007

THE US'S RAMSHACKLE INFRASTRUCTURE
When Will the Next Bridge Collapse?
By Marc Pitzke in New York

The Minneapolis bridge disaster is no isolated incident but a warning signal: More than 160,000 road bridges in the USA are considered to be in danger of collapse. Highways, tunnels, dams and dykes are in such miserable condition that engineers have long been ringing the alarm -- so far in vain.

On April 5, 1987 the Schoharie Creek Bridge in New York state collapsed. The 35-meter-wide highway bridge had only recently been examined. Nevertheless it suddenly gave way, caved in and fell crashing into the river. Five vehicles fell into the river 25 meters below, and ten people died.

The tragic sequence of events bears grisly similarities to the collapse of the Interstate 35W bridge in Minneapolis Wednesday (more...), more than 20 years later. The causes of the accident also seem identical after the preliminary investigation: Wear and tear, obsolescence, carelessness, sloppiness.

It doesn't surprise experts. "The crumbling state of our infrastructure poses a real threat to public safety and the nation's economy," Bill Marcuson, the president of the American Society Of Civil Engineers (ASCE), wrote on his ASCE blog just a few days before the most recent disaster. "Financing the urgently needed repairs must become a priority for our nation's leaders." In total, ASCE calculates, at least $1.6 trillion must be invested in order to avoid further disasters like the one that happened this week in Minneapolis.

Take America's bridges, for example. Two years ago, ASCE produced a "report card" evaluating the US's entire crumbling infrastructure, giving it miserable grades -- and road and highway bridges came off the worst. To that extent, the assurances of dignitaries in the wake of the latest disaster, like Minnesota Sen. Norm Coleman's assertion that "We must ensure that a catastrophe like the one that happened today never occurs again," sound like cynical populism.

In the 2005 report, the ASCE rated 160,570 road bridges in the USA (27.1 percent) as "structurally deficient or functionally obsolete" as of 2003 -- in other words, in danger of collapse. Nevertheless, the ASCE added that that was an improvement over 2000, when 28.5 percent of all bridges were unsatisfactory.

The pitiful state of the country's infrastructure became clear once again on July 18 in Manhattan, when an underground steam pipe at 41st Street and Lexington Avenue near Grand Central Terminal exploded. One woman died, and the driver of a tow truck suffered scalding on over 80 percent of his skin and has been in a coma since then.

Urban bridges are in the worst condition, with almost one-third of bridges in cities being deficient. Among other things, that is because of the fact that the respective city administrations are responsible for these bridges, and not the US freeway authority, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The FHWA wants to reduce the number of defective bridges to under 25 percent by next year. Then, as ASCE boss Marcuson points out, only every fourth bridge would be unsatisfactory -- hardly a reassuring state of affairs. Repairing all of America's bridges would take at least 20 years and would eat up some $10 billion -- money which no one wants to spend.

Miserable Highway Infrastructure

The US freeways got the miserable grade "D" from the ASCE. Around 332,000 kilometers of highways cross the US, most of them built in the 1950s. Hundreds of highways are maintained with the help of toll charges. Nevertheless bad road conditions, potholes, cracked asphalt and broken road surfaces cost US drivers a total of $54 billion each year -- $275 per motorist -- in terms of extra vehicle repairs and operating costs caused by driving on roads in need of repair.

Many drivers miss disasters by a hair's breadth. After a truck accident in Oakland in California on April 29 in which a fire broke out, a highway overpass melted and concrete slabs weighing tons fell on the roadway underneath. Fortunately the debacle happened in the early hours of the morning and not in the middle of the rush hour, and only one man was seriously injured.

The US government currently spends approximately $60 billion annually on highway repairs. But according to the ASCE's calculations, that is far too little: It reckons the necessary investments at nearly $100 billion. In addition, the White House recently forecast that the federal Highway Trust Fund -- a pool of money used to finance maintenance of the highway system, raised by a federal tax of 18.3 cents per gallon on gasoline -- would have a shortfall of around $4 billion by 2009. And that's a conservative estimate, if you listen to the Democrats.

Incompetence

America's road tunnels are not in any better condition -- even the brand new ones. On July 11, 2006, several 12-ton cement ceiling tiles in the "Big Dig" tunnel under Boston's downtown, which had opened at the beginning of 2006, fell down, killing one driver. The ceiling collapse was not an absurd accident, as the authorities first portrayed it, but was caused by incompetence. Since then, the National Transportation Safety Board, an independent federal agency responsible for investigating transportation accidents, have found out that the accident was caused by inferior quality building materials, sloppy work on the part of the construction firms, and carelessness on the part of the local highways department, the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority.

The situation is much worse with the approximately 83,000 dams and dykes in the US. The catastrophe of Hurricane Katrina, which two years ago brought down the inadequate dyke system around New Orleans and caused over 1,800 deaths, revealed problems which are not limited to storm-prone Louisiana. According to the ASCE, the number of "unsafe" dams and dykes has increased by a third to over 3,500 country-wide since 1998. Worryingly, "the number of dams identified as unsafe is increasing at a faster rate than those being repaired," according to the ASCE.

Between 1999 and 2006 alone, 129 dams failed in the USA. Around 1,000 "dam incidents," which alert engineers to deficiencies that threaten the safety of a dam, were reported on top of that. Rural states such as Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Ohio are in the most danger. The Ka Loko dam on the Hawaiian island of Kauai burst in March 2006, killing seven people. The dam at Lake Cumberland in Kentucky could only be prevented from bursting in January 2007 at the last minute by lowering the water level.

The ASCE's list of defects continues. The US's completely overloaded airports get a "D+" grade. The ramshackle drinking water system get the grade "D-" with the ASCE writing that "America faces a shortfall of $11 billion annually to replace aging facilities and comply with safe drinking water regulations." The electric power grid, which is "in urgent need of modernization," likewise gets a "D."

A privatization of America's infrastructure has recently been discussed as a possible solution to the crisis. Banks and private equity companies have already begun to hustle for a piece of the lucrative cake. According to BusinessWeek, public facilities with a value of $100 billion could be transferred to private ownership within the next two years. "There's a lot of value trapped in these assets," Mark Florian, head of North American infrastructure banking at Goldman Sachs, told BusinessWeek.

He's not wrong. Take for instance the Indiana Toll Road, which crosses the north of the US state of Indiana as part of the I-80 and I-90 highways and opened in 1956. Last year the Indiana state government handed it over to the Spanish-Australian Cintra-Macquarie consortium in the form of a 75-year leasing contract, for which the government received $3.85 billion. It's an investment which will repay Cintra-Macquarie generously: According to one conservative estimate, the consortium can expect profits of $21 billion from leasing the toll road over the life of the contract.

Thursday, August 02, 2007

July 23, 2007 The Billionaire Samaritans

Entire article can be found at Spiegel OnLine.

THE BILLIONAIRE SAMARITANS
Can Gates, Soros and Branson Create a Better World?

By Klaus Brinkbäumer and Ullrich Fichtner

Saving the planet used to be a hobby practiced by treehuggers and other romantics. Now it has become the business of executives and billionaires. Pragmatists like Bill Gates, George Soros and Richard Branson are outdoing themselves in a bid to save the planet by applying a good dose of entrepreneurial spirit.

Each day, the task at hand is to save the planet. And everybody's on board, from Cape Horn to Hammerfest, Norway, from Siberia to Hawaii. The issues are the environment, hunger, AIDS. The issues are water, peace, trash. The issues are everything or nothing, the monumental and the insignificant. The race is on among all of those feeling the torment brought on by the fate of the world. Some take to the stage to give musical expression to their worries. Others toil away in isolation to crack the problems, big and small, that are besetting the planet.